How Judges Make Decisions: Behind-the-Bench Insights from TV Shows

Have you ever wondered how judges make decisions in a TV show? Maybe you shouldn’t take insights from TV shows completely seriously, since some programs are just shows. However, this does not mean that their judicial decisions were invented out of the blue. Almost always there is a long analysis of the case and a legitimate reprimand. Although some shows favor the moral point of view over the legal point of view, these 2 components of court decisions are very often opposite. How to find balance? Here is a selection of shows about court cases, as well as some interesting facts about what happens behind the scenes of such shows.

Best Shows About Judges

#1 Hot Bench

The TV show “Hot Bench” stands out from other courtroom dramas by showcasing a panel of three judges, rather than just one. These judges take turns hearing and deliberating on cases, injecting a captivating dynamic into the courtroom setting. By offering viewers various perspectives on each case, the format of the show adds an extra layer of intrigue to the proceedings.

If you want to get a behind-the-scenes look at court proceedings, Hot Bench is perfect for that. You can set up a VPN for Kodi and freely watch any TV series, no matter what regional restrictions are imposed on it. To add a VPN to Kodi, you only need to spend a couple of minutes. At this link, you can find instructions and tips for choosing a VPN.

#2 The People’s Court

One of the court shows with the longest run in history is “The People’s Court,” which first aired in 1981. Just like Judge Judy, it showcases real-life cases presented to a judge who presides over small claims disputes. The show follows a familiar format, where plaintiffs and defendants present their arguments, witnesses, and evidence. The judge then provides a verdict while offering insights into the legal reasoning behind their decision.

#3 Judge Mathis

Retired judge Greg Mathis presides over cases from his own courtroom in “Judge Mathis.” With his charismatic personality, Judge Mathis brings a one-of-a-kind energy to the show. Viewers can enjoy a diverse range of legal battles, from small claims to family disputes.

#4 Divorce Court

The TV show “Divorce Court” centers around marital disputes and divorce cases, showcasing a straightforward judge who attentively listens to both parties before rendering a verdict. With its emotionally charged and highly personal conflicts, the show captivates viewers. Since 1957, “Divorce Court” has continuously aired, solidifying its place among the long-standing courtroom series.

#5 Judge Joe Brown

Another courtroom show that gained popularity is “Judge Joe Brown” due to its entertaining and charismatic judge, Judge Joe Brown. Even if you have problems accessing the content, find the tool here as the show is worth it. Judge Joe Brown presides over cases that range from small claims to family and criminal disputes, making the show a favorite among Judge Judy fans because of its focus on justice and engaging courtroom proceedings.

Behind-the-Scenes Decision-Making at Hot Bench

DiMango presides alongside Tanya Acker, a Los Angeles-based attorney, and Michael Corriero, a judge in the New York State Supreme Court. Corriero, who had served as a judge for 28 years with a focus on youth court, met Sheindlin while working on a case many years ago. Despite having no TV experience, the judge felt nervous about the role but eventually took it up.

Corriero says, “She was so persuasive. I felt comfortable that I could act the way I’ve always acted.” On the other hand, Acker is a frequent television news commentator but has no experience as a judge. At Sheindlin’s suggestion, she prepared for the role by serving as a temporary judge in the Los Angeles County Superior Court.

It is the chemistry among this camera-friendly trio that keeps the show entertaining. Acker says, “I think people enjoy having three different personalities examining individuals.” She also attributes the show’s popularity to the behind-the-scenes glimpse into judges’ decision-making.

Researchers across the country find litigants and send over an estimated thousand small real claims cases each week, which are then narrowed down to about 20 disputes. The resulting cases range from comedic situations, such as a comedy team performing a bit during their testimony, to serious matters involving domestic violence and significant disputes.

The judges receive the complaint and response in advance and use the examination to fill in any gaps. The process is swift: They hear approximately 10 cases per day, and deliberation can conclude within minutes. If plaintiffs are successful, the show covers the costs, and all litigants receive a small appearance fee. As expected from any good reality show, conflicts are resolved within a half-hour timeframe.

Now in its fifth season with no signs of slowing down, Hot Bench still has a long way to go before catching up to Judge Judy. Judge Judy is currently in its 23rd season and garners an average viewership of more than.

Conclusion

The uniqueness of the Hot Bench show is that 3 judges work on cases at once and they consult with each other. This ensures that an objective and informed decision is made. The show often includes fragments of their conversations and arguments among themselves. The show provides insight into exactly how judges view court cases.